Maintenance of the second wife
The Supreme Court on Friday 18-10-2013 ruled that a woman, duped into marrying a person who was already having a subsisting marriage, would not be affected by the Hindu Marriage Act and would be treated as a legally wedded wife for the purpose of claiming maintenance.
“At least for the purpose of claiming maintenance under Section 125 of Cr.P.C. (Criminal Procedure Code), such a woman is to be treated as the legally wedded wife,” said a bench of Justice Ranjana Prakash Desai and Justice A.K. Sikri in their judgment.
“Thus, while interpreting a statute, the court may not only take into consideration the purpose for which the statute was enacted, but also the mischief it seeks to suppress,” Justice Sikri said rejecting the contention that the second wife had no claim to maintenance as her marriage was not legal in the wake of the subsisting first marriage of her husband.
In this case, Badshah married Shobha Feb 17, 1979 and had a daughter and son from his first marriage. On Feb 10, 2005, he married Urmila Badshah Godse and had a daughter from the wedlock on Nov 28, 2005.
Badshah’s relationship with Urmila, however, got strained when the fact of his marriage surfaced.
Rejecting Badshah’s plea challenging the grant of maintenance of Rs.1,000 to Urmila and Rs.500 to their daughter by the trial court which was upheld by the Aurangabad bench of Bombay High court, the apex court said: “Where alternative constructions are possible, the court must give effect to that which will be responsible for the smooth working of the system for which the statute has been enacted rather than one which will put a road block in its way.”
“If the choice is between two interpretations, the narrower of which would fail to achieve the manifest purpose of the legislation should be avoided,” the judgment said.
“We should avoid a construction which would reduce the legislation to futility and should accept the bolder construction based on the view that parliament would legislate only for the purpose of bringing about an effective result.”
“If this interpretation is not accepted, it would amount to giving a premium to the husband for defrauding the wife,” Justice Sikri said holding that “therefore; at least for the purpose of claiming maintenance under Section 125 of Cr.P.C., such a woman is to be treated as the legally wedded wife”.
“Provision of maintenance would definitely fall in this (social justice adjudication) category which aims at empowering the destitute and achieving social justice or equality and dignity of the individual.
“While dealing with cases under this provision, drift in the approach from ‘adversarial’ litigation to social context adjudication is the need of the hour,” said the bench.
Under Section 494 of the IPC a person who has a spouse living at the time of his second marriage is liable to be punished and that his marriage is void. However, in the case when the first marriage of the person was declared void, the person cannot be held liable under this section.
However, in case, the person have concealed the fact that he is married, in such a case that person can be held liable for cheating.
Banshidhar v Chhabi Chatterjee
“Woman to be legally married to petitioner – maintainability of claim under sec 488 – if petitioner on the date of marriage with the claimant woman had already a legally wedded wife, his marriage with the claimant – woman will be void under sec 11 of the HMA.”
Proof of Second Marriage
In order to prove the second marriage, it is very important that the second marriage was done by all the rituals that are essential according to their customs and practices. Merely a confession that the person has married the second time is not enough. According to the Hindu customs, the performance of Saptapadi and homa are essential to perform in order to get married. A second marriage can be made void under S. 494 only when it has been solemnized with all the rituals and ceremonies.
The Indian Evidence Act provides that in the presence of any probable facts, the person’s conduct and the happening of an event, such are used as the evidence to prove the existence of marriage
Rangnath Parmeshwar v. Pandirao Mali, it was held that if two persons are living as a married couple , then even when there is no prove to that effect, the marriage between them is presumed to be valid.
Maintenance under Section 125 CrPC
A wife has the right to ask for the maintenance from her husband in the case of divorce under Section 125 of CrPC. If a person has treated that particular person as his wife, then that can be treated as a proof of their marriage.
In the case of, Mallika and Anr v. P Kulandi , it was held that in case the husband misrepresented his first wife’s death, his second wife, would have the right to maintenance.
Hindu Marriage Act
The law of maintenance has been given under S. 24 of the HMA. However, this law does not provide maintenance to the second wife but, in a number of cases, the courts have given a wide interpretation to this section. Now, under S. 24 even a second wife can claim maintenance from her husband.
Similarly, under Section 25, HMA the provisions for permanent alimony has also been interpreted widely by the courts to protect the rights of the second wives. After the marriage is annulled, the second wife has the right to claim for maintenance.
In the case of Rajesh Bai v. Shantabai, a woman’s marriage was declared void because of the subsistence of any previous marriage of her husband. Court held that she also has the right to claim maintenance, under Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956 (HAMA).
Hindu Adoption And Maintenance Act
HAMA provides that the second wife can claim maintenance from her husband even after she abandoned him when she comes to know that her husband has another wife living.
However, this line “any other wife living” has been interpreted variously by the different High Courts. In the case of, Satyanarayana v. Sseetheramama, it was held that this phrase did not mean that the husband has to be living with his first wife. The existence of the first wife without any divorce is sufficient.
In a recent decision in July 2015, the Madras High Court held that the second wife of a person who is not legally married has the right to get a family pension of her deceased husband. In this case, a person remarried during the subsistence of his first marriage; thereinafter he lived with his second wife. However, he later took divorce from his first wife. After his death, his daughter from his first marriage claimed his pension and argued that, since his second marriage is void under S. 494 of IPC, she is entitled to the full pension of her father. After pondering upon the facts of the case, Justice D Hariparanthamam held that, even if the marriage was not valid, his second wife remained with him till last and that the second wife had already been given divorce. Given the above reason, the judge gave the second wife the right to the pension of her deceased husband.
The Bombay High Court Decision
Wife from a second marriage has to live with the “illegal” status in Indian society. In cases when the relationship didn’t work, the second wife is left without any maintenance and any share in the property of her husband. But in the recent decision of Chanmuniya vs Virendra Kumar Singh Kushwaha & Anr 2010, the Bombay High Court has given a historic judgment. Justice A B Chaudhari said that even though there is no law that talks about providing maintenance to the wife of the second void marriage, but now the wife can ask for the maintenance and accommodation from her husband under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act.
In this case, Ramaji married Manda, hiding the fact that he had a subsisting marriage. However, he treated Manda as his wife and had two daughters out of his second marriage.
“It is no doubt true that Ramaji had cheated Manda and had kept sexual relationships with her resulting in the birth of two children… despite holding that there had been close relationship between applicant and respondent and he treated her like wife and produced children, unfortunately, this court cannot help Manda for providing her maintenance, under the Hindu law. This is a fit case for Manda to have recourse to the provisions of the new beneficial Act — the Protection of Women From Domestic Violence Act, and proceed against her husband for claiming accommodation, maintenance.”
In the landmark judgment decided by the Supreme Court on October 2013, it was held that in the cases of second marriage a second wife has the right to claim maintenance. If the husband has concealed the fact that he has a spouse living at the time of his marriage, from his second wife, he is bound by law to provide his second wife, with maintenance.
Justices Ranjana P Desai and A K Sikri held that, “Provision of maintenance would definitely fall in this category which aims at empowering the destitute and achieving social justice or equality and dignity of the individual.”
125 of the CrPC provides for the maintenance of the wife from the husband. Such provision has always been for the first wife. But, in the cases where the second wife is kept in dark she is also eligible for maintenance.
Other options- annulment of marriage by the second wife
The HMA provides the right to second wife to get the marriage annulled. Also, the second wife has the right to ask for the divorce under S. 13(1) of HMA. Under S. 13(1) of HMA, a second wife can ask for a divorce in case she finds that her husband has been already married.
A second wife has to suffer a lot due to the social stigma that is attached to the second marriage. The absence of legal recognition of her marriage is a lot of pain. Even though due to the judicial precedent that is available for the maintenance of the second wife, but the absence of the clear provision regarding the maintenance her claim for maintenance depends on the discretion of the judges and getting her right, maybe a long process of law.